Thursday, January 2, 2014

Young and In Trouble

December 15, 2013

Matthew 1:18-25

Click to listen

            Most times the announcement is taken as good news!  Grandparents tell everyone who will listen.  Good friends throw parties and shower the mother-to-be with soft blankets and little booties that are just so cute.  The words, “We’re going to have a baby” will make nearly everyone smile and shout “Congratulations.”

            Most times the announcement is taken as good news, but not always.  Sometimes the baby comes when you least expect it and are ill prepared to take care of it.  Having a child is a tremendous responsibility requiring much care and sacrifice, but not everyone is at that stage in life where they can offer that care.  Not everyone is willing to make the sacrifice needed. It is not always good news when a child comes before you are ready so fear rather than joy becomes the dominant emotion.

            This morning’s scripture is about a most unexpected pregnancy and about the feelings that follow.   It chronicles the response of a young woman in trouble and the man who stands beside her.  Let us pray:

            Lord, most of us want to do the right thing, but often we are uncertain about what that right thing might be.  We see merit on both sides. So, we pray that through your Word and by your Spirit, we might see more clearly the path to take. When we see clearly that path to take, grant us the courage and conviction to follow it.  We pray through Jesus Christ who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.[1]  Amen.

            David Barry the newspaper columnist wrote, “My most vivid childhood memory of Christmas that does not involve opening presents, putting batteries in presents, playing with presents, and destroying presents before sundown, is the annual Nativity Pageant at St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church in Armonk, New York.

            Mrs. Elison was the director and she would tell the children what role they would play based on their artistic abilities.  For example, if you were short you would get a role as an angel, which involved being part of the Heavenly Host and gazing with adoration at the Christ child.

            Shepherd was my favorite role because you got to carry a stick, plus you spent most of the pageant waiting in the back of the closet with a rope that led up to the church bell and about 750,000 bats.  Many were the happy rehearsal hours we shepherds spent back there in the dark, whacking each other with sticks and climbing up the ladder so as to cause bat emission products to rain down upon us.

            After a couple of years as shepherd, you usually did a stint as a Three King.  This was not nearly as good a role because you had to lug around the gold, the frankincense and of course the myrrh, which God forbid you should drop because they were played by valuable antique containers belonging to Mrs. Elison.  Nevertheless, being a Three King was better than being Joseph, since Joseph had to hang around with Mary who was played by a girl.  You had to wait backstage with this girl and walk in with this girl.  Needless to say, you felt like a total wonk, which was not helped by the fact that the shepherds and the three king were constantly suggesting that you really liked this girl.  So, during the pageant Joseph tended to maintain the maximum allowable distance from Mary, as though she were carrying some kind of bacteria.”[2]

            That comes pretty close to describing the relationship between the real Mary and Joseph. He was going to want to keep his distance from Mary, and he would have, had the Lord not intervened.  “Now the birth of Jesus the Messiah took place this way.  When his mother Mary had been engaged to Joseph before they lived together, she was found to be with child….”[3] That last little bit changed everything.  The invitations and the cake, the reception hall and the band had all been booked but now they would all be put on hold and probably canceled.  Babies were supposed to follow marriage, and when that sequence was reversed all of Nazareth would take note. People would talk or rather whisper and point when Mary walked down the street.

            Sometimes people look at Mary as the quintessential, “unwed mother”, but to do so is to misunderstand the marriage customs of first century Israel.  She was not unwed, but she was not exactly wed either.  Marriage in Jesus’ day was a three-step process.  It began with an engagement announcement.  This was always made by the parents, much the same way wedding announcements appear in our newspapers today.  “Mr. And Mrs. so-and-so are pleased to announce…” But, in those days of arranged marriages it could be made when the daughter was still a child. Sometimes the announcement was even made shortly after birth. 

When both the prospective bride and groom came of age, the next step was betrothal, and although the Bibles in the sanctuary indicate that Mary and Joseph were engaged, they were in fact, betrothed.  “The betrothal was what we might call the ratification of the engagement into which the couple had previously entered.  Engagements could be broken by either side by just saying so, but once the betrothal was entered into, it was absolutely binding.”[4]  The couple was considered married even though the marriage ceremony was a year off and that is why Joseph is referred to as Mary’s husband in the verse 19.  To separate during this one year betrothal period would require an official and legal divorce.

            So, when Mary told Joseph she was carrying a child, which he knew most definitely was not his, the sin in his eyes was nothing short of adultery, and the consequence for adultery was clearly defined by his community and by the scriptures they considered to be holy, to be from God.

            Deuteronomy 22:23 spoke directly to this kind of situation.  “If a young woman, a virgin, already engaged to be married and a man meets with her and lies down with her, you shall bring them to the gate and stone them.” We will see later on in the gospels that this was still practiced during Jesus’ day.

            The one and only thing the Bible says about Joseph is that he was a “righteous” man, so he wanted to do the right thing.  His problem was in deciding what the right thing was because sometimes that is not so easily understood. Life is often more gray than black and white and it’s hard to know what to do.  On the one hand Joseph held the scriptures with this clearly stated command.  His culture and community would have followed that without question.  No one would fault him for invoking that commandment, bringing Mary before the elders, point at her growing womb and declare, “The child is not mine.”  The shame would be Mary’s and not his.  People might even throw a little sympathy his way.

            On the other hand, there was this trembling young girl with her story of angels and a coming Messiah.  While, he clearly put no stock in her ramblings, it was evident to him that she was young and confused and in trouble. 

            For him the choice was justice or mercy.  He would invoke one or the other, but which one?

            This is a question most of us have struggled with at one time or another. Parents especially have to decide, “Do we invoke justice to teach him a lesson”, or do we grant mercy to show her we still love her.”  Sometimes justice seems the way to go.  Let him get away with it this time, we think, and next time the consequences could be worse. He has to be taught that this is not the way to do things.  Consequences for actions is a great teacher.

But, other times mercy seems called for. She comes in after curfew, and you are ready to lower the boom, to ground her until she’s thirty-five, but then you notice she’s crying.  Her date did not go well and she asks, “what is wrong with me”, so mercy and a shoulder to cry on seem the course of action to follow.  Sometimes it seems clear cut and you know exactly what to do, but some are not so you just try to do the best you can.

            Joseph, to his credit, thought the spirit of the law should be followed in this case and not the letter of the law.  He decided he would show mercy to Mary and “quietly divorce her”.  There would be no public scandal. She would still face the challenge of carrying and bearing and raising this child on her own, but she would at least avoid an angry stone laden mob.  Most men of Joseph’s day would not have been so kind.

            But then the Bible says, “The Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream”, and the Lord presented Joseph with a third option he hadn’t even considered and that was unbridled grace.  While justice means, “you get what you deserve”, and mercy implies “you don’t get what you deserve”; grace means you receive a gift that no one really deserves.

            God told Joseph to take Mary as his wife and raise this child as his own, for it will be through this child that the grace of God will be seen by all.  So, Joseph did as God instructed, and the rest is, as they say, history.

            The impact and influence that Joseph would have upon Jesus has been well chronicled by students of scripture. There are hints along the way that give us a clue about the relationship between Joseph and Jesus.  Joseph was a carpenter – Jesus became a carpenter.  Joseph was a righteous man who valued mercy and sought to follow the spirit of the law over the letter of the law, and so was Jesus.

            On more than one occasion Jesus used the metaphors of building and construction and carpentry in his parables because that was the language Joseph spoke to him.  When Jesus referred to God as “father”, this image for him was not one of detached coldness, but one of warmth and intimacy, because I think that is what he felt from Joseph. 
                                                                                                                                   
            The home in which Jesus grew would have been much different had Joseph walked away from Mary, but part of the good news of the gospel is that Joseph, by God’s grace, recognized the importance of being a good father, even to a child he knew was not his.  Somehow Joseph learned that it is love and not DNA that makes for a good father.

            That’s an important lesson for most adoptive parents and children learn. Sometimes children are conceived by accident.  They were not intended.  Children who are adopted are chosen. There is nothing accidental about it.  It is love and not DNA that matters.

            For everyone who struggles to do the right thing but sees only shades of gray and is looking for clarity and direction consider the choices Joseph had – justice, mercy, grace?  Then consider the choice Joseph made.  Grace has always been the gift God has given, and it is the gift God hopes to see each of us give to each other.

            There are times when justice is called for when consequences should follow actions. There are times when we mercy seems the way to go because the lesson has been learned.  Repentance and confession have been expressed so consequences are replaced by forgiveness.

It is the grace of God that allows us to see the difference.  It is the Word of the Lord that gives us guidance and direction.

            The table set before us is the perfect example of that.  “For while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”  The bread and the cup are an eternal reminder to us of God’s grace, a gift freely given.  When you receive this gift, consider the gift of grace you may extend to someone else.  This gift, like all good gifts, is meant to be shared.  It is to multiply and grow. 


Let us pray:

            Lord, so often we see gift giving in this season to be a chore.  We struggle through long lines to buy a thing we’re not sure has much meaning anyway.  Help us, Lord, to give with a right spirit.  Remind us that we follow a pattern of grace you set on that first Christmas, for then we experience the joy you intend.  Amen.




[1] John 14:6
[2] Barry, Dave:  Dave Barry’s Greatest Hits.  New York:  Crown Publishers, Inc.  1988. pp.76-78.
[3] Matthew 1:18
[4] Barcaly, William:  Matthew. Westminster Press, Philiadelphia. Pp. 19.

No comments:

Post a Comment